Category talk:Teams - Revision history

Astrozac at 22:59, 15 September 2013

2013-09-15T22:59:58Z

Yiding at 17:52, 14 September 2013

2013-09-14T17:52:55Z

Infobroker at 17:46, 14 September 2013

2013-09-14T17:46:25Z

Infobroker at 17:46, 14 September 2013

2013-09-14T17:46:02Z

Infobroker: Created page with "== '''Casual Reader Point-of-view perspectives:''' == # Teams are teams. They are not just for Heroic teams. # Heroic teams are still Heroes and should be categorized her..."

2013-09-14T17:42:54Z

Created page with "== '''Casual Reader Point-of-view perspectives:''' == # Teams are teams. They are not just for Heroic teams. # Heroic teams are still Heroes and should be categorized her..."

New page

== '''Casual Reader Point-of-view perspectives:''' ==

# Teams are teams. They are not just for Heroic teams.

# Heroic teams are still Heroes and should be categorized here and as Heroes so they can be found easily. Same thinking applies for villains.

This is indeed a shift from how we were doing things in the past, but this is more user friendly.

Thoughts?

--[[User:Infobroker|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker|talk]]) 10:42, 14 September 2013 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:59, 15 September 2013
Line 14:		Line 14:

	--[[User:Yiding\|Yiding]] ([[User talk:Yiding\|talk]]) 10:52, 14 September 2013 (PDT)		--[[User:Yiding\|Yiding]] ([[User talk:Yiding\|talk]]) 10:52, 14 September 2013 (PDT)
		+
		+	They got separated basically to serve as a distinction. I know we did list Villain Groups on the Villains page, but not Teams on the Heroes page, since Teams was a Category. Combining works, but would we need to have subcategories for hero teams and villain teams for differentiation? <br>
		+	To me The Unholy Alliance and the Terrifying Three off the top of my mind are the only villains that feel like "teams." The Iron Legion, Pyramid etc all feel like faceless groups, hence why I gave it that distinction on the old way. <br>
		+
		+	--[[User:Astrozac\|Astrozac]] ([[User talk:Astrozac\|talk]]) 15:59, 15 September 2013 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:52, 14 September 2013
Line 10:		Line 10:

	--[[User:Infobroker\|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker\|talk]]) 10:42, 14 September 2013 (PDT)		--[[User:Infobroker\|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker\|talk]]) 10:42, 14 September 2013 (PDT)
		+
		+	That sounds very reasonable. I'd say we can even get rid of "Teams" on the sidebar.
		+
		+	--[[User:Yiding\|Yiding]] ([[User talk:Yiding\|talk]]) 10:52, 14 September 2013 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:46, 14 September 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:

	# Teams are teams. This categorization applies to Villain teams as well as for Heroic teams.		# Teams are teams. This categorization applies to Villain teams as well as for Heroic teams.
−
	# Heroic teams are still Heroes and should be categorized here and as Heroes so they can be found easily. Same thinking applies for Villains.		# Heroic teams are still Heroes and should be categorized here and as Heroes so they can be found easily. Same thinking applies for Villains.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == '''Casual Reader Point-of-view perspectives:''' ==
-# Teams are teams.  They are not just for Heroic teams.
+# Teams are teams.  This categorization applies to Villain teams as well as for Heroic teams.
-# Heroic teams are still Heroes and should be categorized here and as Heroes so they can be found easily.  Same thinking applies for villains.
+# Heroic teams are still Heroes and should be categorized here and as Heroes so they can be found easily.  Same thinking applies for Villains.