Talk:Samaritan - Revision history

Astrozac at 07:01, 23 September 2013

2013-09-23T07:01:44Z

Astrozac at 13:22, 19 September 2013

2013-09-19T13:22:22Z

Infobroker: double cut and paste problem

2013-09-18T23:10:47Z

double cut and paste problem

Infobroker at 23:07, 18 September 2013

2013-09-18T23:07:56Z

Show changes

Astrozac at 13:26, 18 September 2013

2013-09-18T13:26:22Z

Astrozac at 13:13, 18 September 2013

2013-09-18T13:13:20Z

Infobroker at 01:01, 18 September 2013

2013-09-18T01:01:37Z

Infobroker at 01:00, 18 September 2013

2013-09-18T01:00:27Z

Yiding at 14:28, 17 September 2013

2013-09-17T14:28:11Z

Infobroker at 22:50, 16 September 2013

2013-09-16T22:50:47Z

@@ Line 111: / Line 111: @@
 --[[User:Infobroker|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker|talk]]) 16:07, 18 September 2013 (PDT)
-----------
+-----
 I think this one looks pretty complete, plus with the cover image to the right. [http://web.archive.org/web/20100722012730/http://www.herocopia.com/index.php/1:1 1]. I think one page will work, just figure out a way to combine design wise...<br>
 Template:Usr:ib/sandbox was something located on the Teams category page, but didn't get saved...
 --[[User:Astrozac|Astrozac]] ([[User talk:Astrozac|talk]]) 06:22, 19 September 2013 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:22, 19 September 2013
Line 110:		Line 110:

	--[[User:Infobroker\|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker\|talk]]) 16:07, 18 September 2013 (PDT)		--[[User:Infobroker\|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker\|talk]]) 16:07, 18 September 2013 (PDT)
		+
		+	----------
		+
		+	I think this one looks pretty complete, plus with the cover image to the right. [http://web.archive.org/web/20100722012730/http://www.herocopia.com/index.php/1:1 1]. I think one page will work, just figure out a way to combine design wise...<br>
		+	Template:Usr:ib/sandbox was something located on the Teams category page, but didn't get saved...
		+
		+	--[[User:Astrozac\|Astrozac]] ([[User talk:Astrozac\|talk]]) 06:22, 19 September 2013 (PDT)

@@ Line 95: / Line 95: @@
 --[[User:Astrozac|Astrozac]] ([[User talk:Astrozac|talk]]) 06:13, 18 September 2013 (PDT)
 ----
 '''re: links'''
 Overall we are fine, really.  My comments on it are just me thinking outloud.  Don't get overly worried about it.  All these pages, even the one-liners have value to the project overall.  Perhaps in some ways, especially the one-liners.  I'm glad you are the force making that happen.  It is appreciated.

@@ Line 83: / Line 83: @@
 --[[User:Infobroker|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker|talk]]) 18:01, 17 September 2013 (PDT)
+---
 Again, I always saw these lists as more a master list of their deeds, mentions and appearances and the details behind some of the more important events or things on a character or groups adventures list, of course also gets a good chunk in the more text heavy portions of a characters page. That's why I liked them separate, gives you the best of both worlds, for people who like lists and ordered stuff and the more detailed stuff.<br>
 I actually kind of like the box style for the Cases and Adventures you have in your sandbox better. I know we've talked before about meshing that with the membership timeline.  The Honor Guard one would probably be more unique than others...  Or would that maybe be better alone? <br>
-I'll work on not linking to pages that haven't been created yet. Mostly though I just don't want to have to go back later. But will probably have to when we get issue pages up...
+I'll work on not linking to pages that haven't been created yet. Mostly though I just don't want to have to go back later. But will probably have to when we get issue pages up to provide links from appearances...
 --[[User:Astrozac|Astrozac]] ([[User talk:Astrozac|talk]]) 06:13, 18 September 2013 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:13, 18 September 2013
Line 83:		Line 83:

	--[[User:Infobroker\|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker\|talk]]) 18:01, 17 September 2013 (PDT)		--[[User:Infobroker\|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker\|talk]]) 18:01, 17 September 2013 (PDT)
		+
		+	Again, I always saw these lists as more a master list of their deeds, mentions and appearances and the details behind some of the more important events or things on a character or groups adventures list, of course also gets a good chunk in the more text heavy portions of a characters page. That's why I liked them separate, gives you the best of both worlds, for people who like lists and ordered stuff and the more detailed stuff.<br>
		+	I actually kind of like the box style for the Cases and Adventures you have in your sandbox better. I know we've talked before about meshing that with the membership timeline. The Honor Guard one would probably be more unique than others... Or would that maybe be better alone? <br>
		+	I'll work on not linking to pages that haven't been created yet. Mostly though I just don't want to have to go back later. But will probably have to when we get issue pages up...
		+
		+	--[[User:Astrozac\|Astrozac]] ([[User talk:Astrozac\|talk]]) 06:13, 18 September 2013 (PDT)

@@ Line 70: / Line 70: @@
 --[[User:Yiding|Yiding]] ([[User talk:Yiding|talk]]) 07:28, 17 September 2013 (PDT)
 For the most part, as we have been practising it here, don't sweat the links.  Like I said, I don't have a problem with links when used properly. But I will mention the Scully link you provide is loaded with interface practices that would give a GUI ergonomics engineer nightmares. Including some really bad linking examples.
@@ Line 79: / Line 82: @@
 And in all the noise above,  I forgot to mention in a direct fashion, that given where we are now in terms of available tools and our current processing techniques, I think you take is good as it gets for considerations when deciding where to put content and stuff. Again where it makes sense, and allowing for a certain degree of flexibility.
-----
+--[[User:Infobroker|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker|talk]]) 18:01, 17 September 2013 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:00, 18 September 2013
Line 70:		Line 70:

	--[[User:Yiding\|Yiding]] ([[User talk:Yiding\|talk]]) 07:28, 17 September 2013 (PDT)		--[[User:Yiding\|Yiding]] ([[User talk:Yiding\|talk]]) 07:28, 17 September 2013 (PDT)
		+
		+	For the most part, as we have been practising it here, don't sweat the links. Like I said, I don't have a problem with links when used properly. But I will mention the Scully link you provide is loaded with interface practices that would give a GUI ergonomics engineer nightmares. Including some really bad linking examples.
		+
		+	But here is a minor caveat I will throw out there for serious consideration as people edit. Please try to minimize links that leave the wiki site. Search engines frown on that when rating a site, and I am doing several things to improve search engines rating us. Same is also true of links to nowhere. They see that as a site that is not-ready for prime time and dock points when that number reaches a certain point.
		+
		+	You've probably noticed I am now doing some rudimentary layouts for Cases&Adventure Lists. Those have a long way to go, and I have been in discussion with Fenxy4 on some template options and pushing the symantic MediaWiki functions even farther to get something easy to use and visually interesting. We are even investigating ways to use mediaWiki pages to mimic the Timeline Database functions online right here so others can contribute to its input, and I won't be a bottleneck for that data collection. (It also gives others more influence as to what should be input - which I always consider a healthier dynamics).
		+
		+	And in all the noise above, I forgot to mention in a direct fashion, that given where we are now in terms of available tools and our current processing techniques, I think you take is good as it gets for considerations when deciding where to put content and stuff. Again where it makes sense, and allowing for a certain degree of flexibility.
		+
		+	----

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:28, 17 September 2013
Line 62:		Line 62:

	--[[User:Infobroker\|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker\|talk]]) 15:50, 16 September 2013 (PDT)		--[[User:Infobroker\|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker\|talk]]) 15:50, 16 September 2013 (PDT)
		+
		+
		+	----
		+	Wow, thanks for such thorough responses. It's a lot to chew on. These plans all sound great!
		+
		+	Re: The links. It's a format I've taken from places like the X-Files wiki (e.g. http://x-files.wikia.com/wiki/Dana_Scully#Childhood_and_Teenage_Years) and a few other wikis. When I first saw the format, I thought it was a little weird, but I've come to really appreciate it. It save the hassle of having to go the bottom of the page each time the stray "Where did ''that'' bit of info come from?" pops into your head, then go back up to resume reading. I find it neat and efficient, and it makes the reading experience smoother.
		+
		+	--[[User:Yiding\|Yiding]] ([[User talk:Yiding\|talk]]) 07:28, 17 September 2013 (PDT)

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 '''-- jb the ib --'''
 What '''JB''' said. Lol. <br>
@@ Line 47: / Line 50: @@
 --[[User:Astrozac|Astrozac]] ([[User talk:Astrozac|talk]]) 13:42, 16 September 2013 (PDT)